Editor’s Note: This was sent to me anonymously
———————
PHILADELPHIA, PA \ September 11. 2011 –“Image how the mainstream media would have reported the aftermath of that terrible day, 10 years ago.
If you remember, al Qaeda or their leader, bin Laden, had called it, the attack against, “the white devils”. You cannot find the quote now, as it may have been censored to give the feeling of peace and harmony. But imagine if 9/11 was perpetrated by a European-based ethnic group (the media does not call Europeans, ‘ethnic’).
It would have been considered a racist act!
Some topics in the media before 9/11 concerning race and ethnicity were, racial-profiling and ethnic-intimidation. Politically, there was some congressman who wanted to stop aid to Israel and it was gaining momentum- this was forgotten about after the attacks.
There is something, ethnically and geographically, that the media never mentioned about the 9/11 terrorists. Think multicultural..
They were all Semites and never called ‘racist’. Sure, they were all Arabs but Arabs are part of the Semitic group and the media likes to group certain people for certain things. Like whites for anything racist, etc. I guess the proper term for the Semitic peoples would be middle-easterners, since it is also a locale but they don’t say that.
True, what these 19 Semitic hijackers did cause the Patriot Act to go into affect. Being a law, it affected all Americans for what they [Semites] did. Yet, even today, members of this Semitic group are protected and utilize ethnic-intimidation and racial-profiling laws – and the media is right there with them with consistent reports – that turn-out many civil claims and apparently win many lawsuits. It’s like the law was made for them with all the news stories on these subjects. Thing is, there is no ethnic accountability, which we need as far as groups go, just to rule out any ethnic collusion, legally.
Here’s the kicker, Arabs are defined as ‘white’ by the U.S. Census. This would also apply to the FDIC and the fairness in lending law which states all business loans must be accountable for by race. And since they are officially white, the banks do not have to disclose who they are giving bank loans to, ethnically. You can see this for yourself with the openings of new businesses in your community. The Census dictates to all federal agencies on race considerations. So, basically, federal hate-crime charges shouldn’t apply to members of the same race. But the ‘ethnic’ term comes into play. There are no public percentages, that I have ever seen , that displays what ethnic group gets charged, not charged or are victims of ‘hate crimes’ by the numbers.
All I am asking, is that you look at this group just like you would look at the group you know as, ‘white’. Capable of racism, ethnic discrimination and hate.
Although the media may never report it, find out who is delivering your news to you, ethnically, to be sure there is no collusion. Or just go by what you actually see compared to what you are being fed.
-Jack C. anonymous
About the Author
